Accountability Instruments
Three distinct tools built on the Vordan Doctrine. Each measures accountability at a different depth, against a different subject, using a different evidentiary standard. Together they constitute a complete accountability measurement architecture.
The Vordan Doctrine identifies six structural properties every accountable governance system must possess: Origin, Voice, Traceability, Timing, Response, and Transparency. These properties are universal. Every Vordan instrument operationalizes them differently: different subjects, different evidentiary depths, different outputs.
The VAF applies them inside an organization. The VEPA applies them to an organization's observable public record. The AAB applies them to the specific governance conditions created by autonomous AI agents. No instrument duplicates another. No gap between them is accidental.
Published Instruments: Version 0.1 and above
The VAF is Vordan's primary organizational assessment instrument. It evaluates accountability architecture across six modules (Origin, Voice, Traceability, Timing, Response, and Transparency) using a stratified deployment sample, practitioner interviews, evidence production under defined timeframes, and sequential signature gates.
The VAF produces an Accountability Gap Score out of 100. A score of 0 means no gap. A score of 100 means fully Absent across all components. The goal is not a perfect score. It is a documented trajectory of closing the distance. Reserved for organizations that engage Vordan directly or are formally assessed under the published methodology.
The VEPA evaluates the observable accountability posture of any organization, platform, or institution using the public record as its sole evidentiary basis. It requires no organizational cooperation. Its findings are scoped explicitly to what is observable, and its methodology is published so that any finding can be evaluated, contested, or verified by any party with access to the same public record.
Two assessments are published to date. VEPA-2026-001 assessed Salesforce's response to the ShinyHunters / UNC6040 campaign (Posture Score: 2.1). VEPA-2026-002 assessed UK Visa Portal following the exposure of at least 100,000 biometric documents without authentication controls (Posture Score: 4.2).
The AAB is Vordan's framework standard for autonomous AI deployments. It maps every control requirement: agent identity, permission scope, memory governance, activity trail, approval gates, forensics, to an accountability condition. Not whether the log exists, but whether the log constitutes accountability. The distinction is where the gap lives.
The AAB is the instrument that harness vendors cannot produce without a conflict of interest. It defines what "sufficient" looks like from a governance standpoint: the standard against which any agentic deployment can be assessed, independent of the vendor providing the deployment infrastructure.